Home / Solar by city / Las Vegas, NV
Solar panels in Las Vegas, NV
Every figure below is produced by simulating a full year — 8,760 hours — of sun angles, cloud cover, air temperature and wind for Las Vegas, then running the result through a panel and inverter model. No rules of thumb.
What a system actually produces here
Solar output in Las Vegas peaks in May and bottoms out in December, a swing of about 1.6×. That seasonal shape matters more than the annual total if your utility settles exports monthly rather than annually — a big summer surplus can be worth much less than the same energy spread evenly.
| Month | Sun (kWh/m²/day) | kWh per kW | 7 kW system |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 3.2 | 119 | 831 |
| Feb | 4.2 | 124 | 868 |
| Mar | 5.6 | 158 | 1,109 |
| Apr | 7.0 | 170 | 1,187 |
| May | 7.9 | 178 | 1,248 |
| Jun | 8.2 | 168 | 1,176 |
| Jul | 7.7 | 163 | 1,139 |
| Aug | 7.1 | 159 | 1,115 |
| Sep | 6.1 | 148 | 1,035 |
| Oct | 4.7 | 138 | 965 |
| Nov | 3.5 | 116 | 812 |
| Dec | 2.9 | 111 | 777 |
Electricity rates that shape the payback
What a solar system saves in Las Vegas depends less on how much it produces than on when it produces, and what your utility pays for the surplus. These are the NV schedules modelled by the calculator:
NV Energy — Residential TOU (Optional Rate D)
Nevada still credits exports — but at 75% of retail, the fourth and final step of AB 405. Fixed charge $18.50/month.
Summer On-peak $0.34, Off-peak $0.12.
Winter On-peak $0.16, Off-peak $0.12.
Source: NV Energy residential TOU schedule; PUCN net metering tiers under AB 405
Run your own numbers
Payback depends on what you pay for the system, how much power your household uses after dark, and which incentives you qualify for — none of which a city page can know. The calculator asks for those and settles all 8,760 hours against your actual rate.
See also: solar incentives in Nevada — the state credit, the export rules, and what the §25D expiry changed for buyers here.
Other cities
- Phoenix, AZLos Angeles, CASan Francisco, CASan Diego, CAFresno, CASalt Lake City, UTDenver, COAustin, TXHouston, TX
Method
Irradiance is decomposed into beam and diffuse components and projected onto the array plane with the Perez model, with incidence-angle losses, a cell-temperature model driven by air temperature and wind, and an inverter efficiency curve including clipping. Annual yield is checked against NREL PVWatts v8 across all 18 modelled cities; RMS error is 2.70%. See the glossary for what each term means.